Why Did the Wall Street Journal Bury the Merck Fraud Story?

==== ====
Why Did the Wall Street Journal Bury the Merck Fraud Story?
http://theuniversalfiles.blogspot.com/
==== ====
Why Did the Wall Street Journal Bury the Merck Fraud Story?
By Dr. Mercola
It was big news when court documents were unsealed revealing a whistleblower lawsuit accusing
drug giant Merck of fraud and lying about the true efficacy of its mumps vaccine. Just about every
media, large and small, picked it up and the world was abuzz about the hundreds of millions of
dollars the lawsuit claimed Merck had defrauded from the U.S. government.
The Wall Street Journal published the story in the form of a Dow Jones news release written by
Jon Kamp on June 22, 2012, and links to the story began popping up on social media like
Facebook.
Then, suddenly, the link to the story no longer worked, and if anyone clicked on the link in social
media, it would show up "page not found." Apparently the story had been pulled, and when search
engines and Internet archives wouldn't even show it, it looked as if it had never been published on
the Journal's site at all. It was erased nearly clean--except for a small stock-watcher's website,
4Traders.com, which did a good job of erasing it from its main site but didn't catch it in the cache.
The question is, why did the WSJ pull the story and try to erase as if it never existed when there
were actual court documents for evidence?
Is it possible that an event that occurred on June 251—three days after the story broke—could
have influenced the story being pulled? On that day, the Wall Street Journal’s "elite" network of
CFOs from the world’s top corporations met at the WSJ2. Merck is on that executive council3.
My team attempted to connect with the WSJ on this issue, but as of this time, we have not yet
received an answer as to why this article was pulled.
Merck Accused of Falsifying Efficacy Studies and Lying about Effectiveness of Mumps Vaccine
Merck has actually been slapped with two class-action lawsuits over their mumps vaccine (which
is part of the trivalent measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine). The first, which was initially
filed in 2010, was unsealed late last month.
Two former Merck virologists, Stephen Krahling and Joan Wlochowski, claim they witnessed firsthand
the improper testing and falsification of data that was done to hide the fact that the vaccine
has significantly declined in effectiveness4.





References:
1
The Wall Street Journal CFO Network, 2012 Program
2
The Wall Street Journal CFO Network Annual Meeting
3 Newscorp.com, Wall Street Journal to Assemble Council of Leading Chief Financial
Officers, April 18, 2011
4 Courthouse News Service June 27, 2012
5 See ref 4
6 See ref 4
7 Greenmedinfo.com, Scientists Sue Merck: Allege Fraud for MMR Vaccine, July 4, 2012
8 See ref 7
9 See ref 4
10
Forbes June 27, 2012
11 Daily Mail, MMR: A mother's victory. The vast majority of doctors say there is no link
between the triple jab and autism, but could an Italian court case reignite this controversial
debate?, June 16, 2012
12 Vaccine May 31, 2012 [Epub ahead of print]
ources:
NewsCorp April 18, 2011
Wall Street Journal June 25, 2012
Wall Street Journal June 25, 2012


want to discover more,go todr.mercola.com      Ihope you liked the article.thomas